Back in 2012, there was an NPR "All Things Considered" interview with Joe Queenan that I vividly remember. He's an author who purportedly reads 125 books a year, even managing to squeeze in 250 one time before "running out of steam." When asked why he reads so much, he responded as follows: "People who read an enormous number of books are basically dissatisfied
with the way things are going on this planet. And I think, in a way,
people read for the same reason that kids play video games ... they like
that world better. It works better, it's more exciting, and it usually
has a more satisfactory ending."
I don't read anything close to 125 books in a year. Counting assignments for English class, I'd be lucky to finish forty. During the school year, I just don't have the time to read anything substantial. I try to make up for these dearths by taking in as much as possible during breaks, but I always wish I could consume more. Despite that, I think that I understand Mr. Queenan. The world is a morally ambiguous and terrifying place. Between climate change, pandemic, nuclear war, and a million other cultural and political threats, it can be difficult to remain optimistic about our future. Books provide a sort of escape for their readers; an opportunity to immerse oneself in another world where the problems of everyday life aren't so overwhelming. Even the most horrifying of novels is easier to contemplate than the quagmire of connections that constitute our modern society. For example, I read David Mitchell's Cloud Atlas over winter break. It [SPOILER] rapidly transitions from pleasant historical fiction to gruesome dystopia to the collapse of civilization and implied extinction of the human race [END SPOILER]. Even so, it manages to end on an optimistic note that gives a purer hope to the reader than any of the real-life heroes constantly being ripped apart by trolls on the Internet can.
This purity is why I like the arc of the hero's journey so much. There's something beautiful in the idealism of an ordinary person going off on wild adventures, overpowering evil, and returning home with the power to solve their own problems. These days, it seems that a lot of people criticize the classic hero for being too one-dimensional or unrealistic. Most of the time I read, I want something unrealistic. I experience real life every day, and books provide an chance for me to get away from that.
In addition, heroes don't have to be cynical or amoral in order to be complex. Take Les Misérables, for example (I refer here to the musical, not the Hugo novel. The book treats some of the characters rather differently, but I haven't read it so I'm not able to speak intelligently on the matter.). Almost every single character can be regarded as a hero, and while only one of them is morally complex, each one has a unique outlook on life. Jean Valjean, the main character, is a reformed conflict who was originally imprisoned for stealing bread to feed his starving family. He spends his entire life running from the law only because he needs to do good in the world. Enjolras is an idealistic student who becomes a revolutionary leader and is tragically killed at the climax of the show. Eponine is the victim of unrequited love, but stays loyal to her beloved until she is killed trying to help him. They never show any immorality whatsoever, but are incredibly interesting and complex in their interactions with each other, giving the show depth without comprimising its archetypically heroic nature.
Some people feel that heroes are a cliché, or that the heroic narrative has been done too many times before to remain engaging to modern audiences. To them, I say that literature is not about the what, it's about the how and the why. In the words of Mr. Queenan, "As long as there are beautiful books waiting for us out there, there is
still a chance that we can turn the ship around and find a safe harbor.
There is still hope, in the words of Faulkner, that we shall not only
survive; we shall prevail. There is still hope that we shall all live
happily ever after."
And the hero's journey gives me that hope.
I read this post after reading the comment you left on my post, and I'm glad I did because this is pretty much the exact opposite of what I wrote but I can definitely see where your viewpoint is coming from. I think your last paragraph especially got to the heart of why most people do enjoy hero narratives so much and why 2000-year old novels like the Odyssey still resonate with us all today: it is kind of a hopeful thing to make yourself believe that there can be a world where a hero does exist, and even when now it's cool to be cynical and stuff, we all still do want to believe that we can be heroes too.
ReplyDeleteI really like your post and I agree with you on many of the points. However, I think that we want to escape from the world because it is not overwhelming, but underwhelming. I mean, why would you be reading on break? You could be outside, on an adventure, right? The thing is, adventures don't happen in the real world, at least not to us, and definitely not in the way they happen in books. So we read to go to a place that is more interesting then ours.
ReplyDeleteAlso, people don't necessarily want to read an more realistic book because they believe the classic heroes are too simple. One reason people want to read life-like works is so that they can better escape. Ironically, it is much easier to escape to a world that is like yours than it is to enter one that is much different. If you look closely, you will see that even the most outlandish book has more similarities to our world than it has differences.
Is the world really more underwhelming compared to a book than overwhelming? Fictional worlds are, while not entirely black and white, more black and white than the real worlds, with many fewer layers of complexity to overwhelm us. Without sacrificing security, I suppose you cannot adventure in the real world, and yet there are so many problems in this world compared to fictional worlds that I'm not sure whether this world is much more uninteresting at times than a fictional world.
DeleteI've noticed that as I've been going through high school and getting older, I no longer stay up all night reading books by flashlight past my bedtime because I need to get in just one more chapter. As I've gotten older, I've gotten less and less involved in reading because I have other things to do - study for a test, write an essay, go to robotics - so reading has taken a backseat.
ReplyDelete